<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>E-learning for the world --how realistic?</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://il.webjunction.org/c/message_boards/find_thread?p_l_id=931696&amp;threadId=4287173" />
  <subtitle>E-learning for the world --how realistic?</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <title>Re: E-learning for the world --how realistic?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://il.webjunction.org/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=931696&amp;messageId=4287177" />
    <author>
      <name>Emily Inlow-Hood</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2008-02-18T18:58:46Z</updated>
    <published>2008-02-18T18:58:46Z</published>
    <summary type="html">I came across this paper over the weekend about distance/e&amp;#045;learning in Iraq.  It brings up some interesting points about the benefits and challenges to e&amp;#045;learning in a conflict zone.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;[url http://greatlibrarynews.blogspot.com/2008/02/distance&amp;#045;learninge&amp;#045;learning&amp;#045;for&amp;#045;iraq.html]Distance Learning/e&amp;#045;learning for Iraq: Concept and Road Map[/url].&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Emily</summary>
    <dc:creator>Emily Inlow-Hood</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-02-18T18:58:46Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>E-learning for the world --how realistic?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://il.webjunction.org/c/message_boards/find_message?p_l_id=931696&amp;messageId=4287172" />
    <author>
      <name>Betha Gutsche</name>
    </author>
    <updated>2008-02-18T18:52:35Z</updated>
    <published>2008-02-18T18:52:35Z</published>
    <summary type="html">Online learning is picking up steam as a cost&amp;#045;effective, time&amp;#045;saving solution to training and development. Yet even in the US, I still see obstacles for some people to participate fully. &lt;br /&gt;Issues include:&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#045;&amp;#045;bandwidth and connection speed&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#045;&amp;#045;having a dedicated computer for e&amp;#045;learning&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#045;&amp;#045;finding the time and getting supervisor support&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When I try to imagine how library staff in other countries, especially developing countries, might take advantage of the e&amp;#045;learning courses available online, I start to see the hurdles mount. In another post, [url forums/thread.jspa?messageID=50195&amp;#035;50195 ]Mumtaz Memon[/url] talks about her experience trying to use WebJunction from Pakistan. She points out that just the terminology can be a major barrier. &lt;br /&gt;All of the barriers above apply, plus some additional ones:&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#045;&amp;#045;access to the Internet&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#045;&amp;#045;how to pay for online courses&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#045;&amp;#045;how to address cultural differences&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&amp;#039;m sure there are many more. Let&amp;#039;s talk about them. And let&amp;#039;s see if we can come up with some solutions.</summary>
    <dc:creator>Betha Gutsche</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-02-18T18:52:35Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

