Library Systems  
RSS
Threads [ Previous | Next ]
Resource Sharing Standards
Resource Sharing Standards
10:52 AM EDT 4/30/09
Your comments are welcomed regarding the discussion draft of the Resource Sharing standards. Click on the Overview tab and you will find the draft document posted at the top of the list. The Library System Standards Committee will be reviewing the comments at its meeting on May 28, 2009. Thank you.
RE: Resource Sharing Standards
12:43 PM EDT 5/20/09 as a reply to Kathleen Bloomberg.
I have a couple of questions. Is there a difference between D and E under Illinois Library System Responsibilities? D talks about encouraging member libraries to participate in a shared ILS. E address participation in the creation of regional and/or statewide automated systems. Is there a practical or technical difference between the two?

In the same section (Illinois Library System Responsibilities) H and M are redundant, as they are included in A.

And for the less academic libraries, could a definition of "resource description" be included? I am assuming this refers to cataloging, but am not sure I understand the phrase's meaning.

I love the fact that several complementary services (cataloging, ILL, delivery, etc.) are grouped together. This is very practical. Thank you!
RE: Resource Sharing Standards
12:56 PM EDT 5/21/09 as a reply to Kathleen Bloomberg.
System Responsibilities d. “Strongly encourage member libraries to participate in a shared integrated library system. Systems should work collaboratively to eliminate existing restrictions on participation in such systems.”

I am not sure what this means. Is this allowing a system to let a library from another system into their database (LLSAP)? Currently, participation in the LLSAP is reserved for full members of the system. With different membership standards between systems and different thresholds for LLSAP membership this would be problematic. Local control of the LLSAP, which has made it a strong resource for its members, could be compromised.

Reciprocal Borrowing is mentioned under system responsibilities in m. and again under member responsibilities in h. Is not reciprocal borrowing a public library activity defined as a patron going to a library not his/her home library and checking out materials? There may be some intergovernmental agreements between public and academic libraries for mutual reciprocal borrowing between citizens and students but they are outside of the current reciprocal borrowing agreements.

M should state “Establish policies that support the reciprocal borrowing of materials among all ILLINET Public libraries. Correspondingly, h under Member Responsibilities would read, “Public libraries would be strongly encouraged to participate in reciprocal borrowing agreements within the System and statewide.

The concept of reciprocal access is not mentioned. This happens when a library makes available materials by loan, photocopying, or through arrangements for library visits.

All libraries should provide reciprocal access to their library’s collections as legally permitted.
RE: Resource Sharing Standards
1:15 PM EDT 5/21/09 as a reply to Kathleen Bloomberg.
I suggest a clause at the end of point e in Expectations: “Systems shall develop shared staff expertise in resource sharing and shall collaborate to identify and implement inter-system and statewide resource sharing solutions while not compromising local and regional resource sharing strengths.

In point n of Illinois Library System Responsibilities, I have a concern about the ability to develop “equitable, statewide delivery frequencies.” With the extremes of geographical density, traffic patterns, and distances involved among the various library systems, there may not be an equitable frequency statewide. Perhaps a better goal would be to establish minimum frequency levels and allow systems to develop delivery schedules that best meet the needs of the member libraries and their patrons.
RE: Resource Sharing Standards
3:07 PM EDT 7/1/09 as a reply to Kathleen Bloomberg.
Dear Kathleen,

The Resource Sharing portion seems very thorough. Kudos to you and your team.

I have a few questions about c under Assessments:

"Each System shall monitor and evaluate the resource sharing capabilities and effectiveness of member libraries."

I just wonder at the practicality of say my system, NSLS, evaluating over 400 libraries and their capabilities for resource sharing. Are there consequences if we are found not to be sharing effectively? Is that the role of each System? Is this evaluation yearly? quarterly?

Thank you for clarification,

Jeanné Lohfink

District Librarian, Beach Park CCSD #3

NSLS Board Member